Hello everyone, i just wanted to know why this solution cannot be solved using greedy approach https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1005/submission/76980469
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
Hello everyone, i just wanted to know why this solution cannot be solved using greedy approach https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1005/submission/76980469
Name |
---|
I guess, this is not the correct greedy approach. For number $$$20302$$$, your code gives answer $$$0$$$ whereas it should be $$$3$$$.
In my opinion, the correct greedy would be what you are doing, and additionally if you encounter $$$0$$$, $$$3$$$, $$$6$$$ or $$$9$$$ make a separator there.
Exactly, the better greedy aprroach is using DP, then $$$dp_i$$$ means the answer when we consider first $$$i$$$ elements, it can be updated in two ways, the last block which has $$$ith$$$ position is divisible by 3, or not, if not then $$$dp_i$$$ will be equal to $$$dp_{i-1}$$$, and otherwise cut the smallest block which is divisible by 3, then $$$dp_i$$$ will be $$$dp_j+1$$$(finding the smallest block can be done whit a precalculation with $$$O(n)$$$ time).
The whole problem will be $$$O(n)$$$.
This might help you.
Thanks a lot poduingi