hello there, I tried to solve a problem which is directly based on the Longest common substring. I solved it quite easily with the bottom-up (DP) approach because it seemed more intuitive to me then top-down since I just needed to extend to the idea of Lcs(longest common subsequence).

below, how is implemented bottom-up approach:

def findLength(A,B):
       
        m,n=len(A),len(B)
        dp=[0]*(n+1)
        ans=0
        for i in range(m):
            for j in range(n,0,-1):
                if A[i]==B[j-1]:
                    dp[j]=dp[j-1]+1
                    ans=max(ans,dp[j])
                else:
                    dp[j]=0
        return ans

I tried to implement the same using top-down approach but did not succeed. 
I would like to share my thought that how I landed on my recursive relation. let `A, B` are two strings are given and `def lcs(i,j):` # function.
`dp[i][j]` represents LC_Substring  after considering ith elements and jth elements of two string respectively.
Now if `A[i]==B[j]` then `dp[i][j] = 1+lcs(i-1,j-1)`
else: dp[i][j]=0, also we need check at lcs(i-1,j) and lcs(i,j-1) irrespective of if-else,
to clarify my points i would take an example `,A= 'aab' and B='aabb'`,recursive call start with `i=3 and j=4,`
since `A[3]==B[4]`,`dp[3][4]=1+lcs(2,3)` but the required output is achieved when we consider `lcs(3,3)` .

below is the code I submitted which passed 31/54 test cases and throwsTLE.

        m,n=len(A),len(B)
        dp={}
        ans=0
       
        def lcs(i,j):
          
            if i==0 or j==0:
                return 0
            elif dp.get((i,j)):
                return dp[(i,j)]
            if A[i-1]==B[j-1]:
                dp[(i,j)]=1+lcs(i-1,j-1)
                ans=max(ans,dp[(i,j)])
            else:
                
                dp[(i,j)]=0
            lcs(i-1,j)
            lcs(i,j-1)
            return dp[(i,j)]
        lcs(m,n)
        return ans

my queries :

1. is the time complexity of my top-down approach is O(m*n)?
2. is my recursive relation for top-down right?
3. it considered good practice for a beginner to solve first top-down then move to bottom-up , but in this case, is it not case that bottom-up seems more intuitive?
4. where my thought went process wrong?
5. what would be right or efficient way to interpret these types of questions and approach them?

Thanks a million in advance. happy coding