Блог пользователя mesanu

Автор mesanu, история, 6 лет назад, По-английски

Hello Codeforces!

SlavicG and I are glad to invite you to Unofficial Div 4 Round #2. Which will take place this Wednesday at 14:35 UTC (The round is over now, but you can still participate virtually). The round will not be rated for any participants since it is unofficial.

Contest link: https://mirror.codeforces.com/gym/102873

You will be given six tasks and two hours to solve them. The problems were created and prepared by mesanu and SlavicG for users with a rating range from 0 to 1400 but anyone is welcome to participate in the round!

We want to thank everyone who was involved in the round preparation:

Errichto for thorough testing and publishing this round on the gym.

Also, after the contest Errichto will post videos about this contest and the responsibilities of a tester.

UPD: Videos are now up: Fixing A, Testing A, Testing the rest.

Brodicico for help with problems and testing the round.

And a huge thank you to the testers: Errichto, Monogon, galen_colin, gupta_samarth, arujbansal, Chihai_Ion and Grumpah .

MikeMirzayanov for Polygon and Codeforces platforms.

Even though the contest is unrated, we believe it is an excellent way of practice, especially for Div 4 users.

Remember, if you don't know how to solve one problem, look at others!

UPD 1: Registration available now!

UPD 2: Round is over! We hope you enjoyed the problems and congratulations to the winners!

UPD 3: Editorial is out!

Div. 4 winners:

  1. gnudgnaoh

  2. anshu_man

  3. Pranava23

Not Div.4 Winners:

  1. Geothermal

  2. Maksim1744

  3. Mucosolvan

First to solve each problem:

A: First: Valera_Grinenko

Div. 4 first: anuragdvd

B: First: Geothermal

Div. 4 first: Esdeath_1

C: First: Geothermal

Div. 4 first: Esdeath_1

D: First: Geothermal

Div. 4 first: RamPrabodhInduri

E: First: Geothermal

Div. 4 first: -deleted-

F: First: IgorI

Div. 4 first: sahaun

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +244
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +167 Проголосовать: не нравится

As a tester, the setters are holding me hostage and forcing me to make an "as a tester" comment.

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +76 Проголосовать: не нравится

as a fellow tester, ....

You know the drill

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +25 Проголосовать: не нравится

As not a tester, the setters are not holding me hostage and forcing me to make an "as a not tester" comment. Good luck to all participating. May your cp girlfriends help you solve all the problems.

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +167 Проголосовать: не нравится

I recorded the process of testing this round and complaining about bad statements, weak tests, etc. I even told the authors to replace one problem because it was stupid. That was a few weeks ago and the contest is well-prepared now, so I recommend participating.

On a related note, I'm going to create a guide on how to properly test a problem, especially in Polygon. Implementing a correct solution is actually less important than checking the validator, going through sample test explanation, or stress-testing the main solution with brute force. We get so many testers in CF rounds nowadays but they usually just solve problems. That being said, testing by solving problems still helps a lot in many aspects like estimating the difficulty and choosing proper TL, so it's great that testers are so appreciated recently!

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +43 Проголосовать: не нравится

As the only cyan tester...

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

I would like to thank ssense, SlavicG, Errichto, AlexNeagu, Monogon, galen_colin, gupta_samarth, arujbansal, Chihai_Ion, Grumpah, MikeMyrzayanov for being orz.

Also for creating a div 4 round! I hope noob like me can win it!

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

mesanu SlavicG i think your Div.4 idea is very good. Wish we had regular Div.4 in Codeforces. It's very good practive for newbies like me (only 141 points at IATI Shumen Junior).

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

It's a great idea to have these rounds. Hope to see more like this in the future.

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

What is the range difficulty of rating of problems?

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

thank you so much for all who help to create this round for us.

»
6 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +2 Проголосовать: не нравится

That would be great for beginners :)

Hope to see more like this in the future

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

RZK_19 see this

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

How to win this? Strategy is required !

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +27 Проголосовать: не нравится

ping, it starts in 5 minutes.

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

very long queue now , i m exiting from the contest . Sorry guys i hope it will be better next time

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

Nice set of problems!

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

Is it Div. 5?

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Problems were interesting with respect to div 4 :D Had fun! Thank You for this round.

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

can anyone plz explain approach to f

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
Rev. 3  
Проголосовать: нравится +23 Проголосовать: не нравится

Sorry about the long queue. Something was wrong with the system at the beginning and nothing was being judged. When everything started working properly after half an hour or so, the waiting time was at some peaks around 5 minutes and that was my bad because we had a lot of tests. I should have predicted that there will be enough participants that testing time might be an issue. Sorry! But again, the first 30 minutes were about unlucky technical issues :(

It was extra annoying that there was some CF error and we couldn't make any public announcement. We wanted to at least say something like "We're sorry about a long queue, it should be fixed soon".

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
Rev. 2  
Проголосовать: нравится +27 Проголосовать: не нравится

Here's a 1-hour recording of me fixing a badly prepared problem A, and explaining to authors what should be done better. Half of the video is about generating good tests so maybe it's more useful for problem setters rather than for testers. https://youtu.be/KnMOEiySz0Y

UPD

Initial testing of A: https://youtu.be/L6cb9IOv4cE

Testing of the whole round: https://youtu.be/I7AJtUcVoxw

Coming later: a guide for testers.

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +18 Проголосовать: не нравится

In E statement said contain string t. It's not clear that as substring or subsequence and all the example work with two cases.

»
5 лет назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится +27 Проголосовать: не нравится

First time I am mentioned as a "winner" in a blog post, hopefully not the last one :D