I've tried all test cases from uDebug and some random test case but could not find out wrong answer.
Is there any corner cases, which i've been not taking?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3631 |
| 4 | Kevin114514 | 3574 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 3521 |
| 6 | strapple | 3515 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3461 |
| 8 | tourist | 3428 |
| 9 | turmax | 3378 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 140 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
I've tried all test cases from uDebug and some random test case but could not find out wrong answer.
Is there any corner cases, which i've been not taking?
| Name |
|---|



Not sure what your solution is or why are you taking max but i guess the solution should look something like this :
$$$dp[val][cnt] = \displaystyle\sum_{x=1}^{val} dp[val-x][cnt-1]$$$ with base case $$$dp[0][0] = 1$$$
Where $$$dp[i][j]$$$ means the number of ways to get sum $$$i$$$ with exactly $$$j$$$ coins. You can answer all the other types using these dp values.