The other day I met a problem that needed to count the number of primes less than n with n <= 1e10. But I only know how to use sieve to solve but it can only run with n <= 1e6. Can you help me find a better solution? thanks for help!
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 147 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
The other day I met a problem that needed to count the number of primes less than n with n <= 1e10. But I only know how to use sieve to solve but it can only run with n <= 1e6. Can you help me find a better solution? thanks for help!
| Название |
|---|



use segmented sieve, you can easily find videos of it on youtube
Thank your idea.This is the good sieve but this can run with n<=1e8.I think another better way to solve this problem.
there exists approximate prime counting function, which gives very accurate result for small N
I had the same curiosity a while ago, so I wrote some code to find pi(n) (which is what you need) and prime(n) (n-th prime number). You can play with N and X constants to see which gives better times. Here is the code. I used Meissel–Lehmer algorithm. You can read here and here about it. If you don't understand, don't be shy and ask me! Happy new year! :D
I don’t understand how to calculate Pi(x,a). Can you explain it to me?
In my code it's the function P(niv, n, a) which, I think, it's pretty clear how it works
I understood. Thanks you so much!
But can you explain me X in your code for what?
Yes sure. X is max i so that we calculate Pi(n, a). Increasing X, lowers initial a, but it might cause P function to take much more time. After testing, I found that X should be 6 or 7.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissel%E2%80%93Lehmer_algorithm