Блог пользователя the_stone_dawg

Автор the_stone_dawg, история, 4 года назад, По-английски

In working on upsolving https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1513/problem/D, I ran into this weird aspect of c++ I need some help explaining:

Part of the solution involved iterating over a sorted ordering, which I initially achieved by inserting everything into a map (not hashmap). I understand that iteration over a map in c++ should produce elements in sorted order. However, this produced a WA result, like in this submission: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1513/submission/112967965.

On replacing the map with an array and then manually sorting that array however, the solution was accepted, like here:https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1513/submission/112968002

The only difference between the two submissions is changing the map to a sorted array. To me the logic seems equivalent; iterating over a map should produce an equivalent sorted ordering to the one if you manually sorted an array, however it seems like thats not the case. I was wondering if anyone had any insight on why?

Thanks!

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +9
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

One difference is that duplicate v[i] keys will only cause one {v[i],i} pair to remain in a map, while the vector will store all {v[i],i} pairs. Maybe using a multimap might be more fitting here.

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

I am pretty certain a map does not support duplicated copies of an "index". so if in your array you had any two v[i]'s equal it would fail.

i ran the following test case:

1

5 10

2 3 4 2 2

on your codes in custom invoc and your map code produced 40 while your ac code produced 24 (which is correct). i replaced your map with multimap (and no other changes) and it works for my test case (it actually ac's as well) so the thing here is to use a multimap instead of a normal map. or better just use regular sorting everytime.