Блог пользователя kostka

Автор kostka, 4 года назад, По-английски

Join our online coding competition and tackle fun problems designed by Google engineers! ➡️g.co/kickstart

Round C starts in less than 24 hours (on May 23rd at 11:00 UTC).

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +41
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +38 Проголосовать: не нравится

Yay AC.

I realised that the OJ server is laggy, is that your experience as well?

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I had to wait for at least 2 min to see if my C passed or not (9 times). It was really annoying. I wonder what the reason was for this slowness.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 года назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +9 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Same, it was really frustating, I reloaded the page actually and that basically just removed the submission, when I did it again, again it was coming again I reloaded. Then at last I finally waited after submitting and I saw now that all 3 submission came simultaneously, and all were wrong, now what is this.

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +75 Проголосовать: не нравится

I don't know if it is just me or not... but almost every time I have to wait several minutes to submit my code :(

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +22 Проголосовать: не нравится

Problem B mostly same as https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc190/tasks/abc190_d

just divide the final answer by 2

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +32 Проголосовать: не нравится

Congratulations Errichto on winning the round
Eagerly waiting for your screencast (to know how I messed up today)

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +4 Проголосовать: не нравится

How to solve A test case 2?

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 3   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Since analysis doesn't seem to have been posted yet, how to solve final subtask of P3?

I managed to get an expected value of 16000 with the following but no clue how to improve:

For E = W, random gets you 20 expected wins and 20 expected draws, I believe this is optimal and can't be improved.

For all other cases, find the best constants A, B, C, D where A + B + C + D = 60 such that playing Rock A times, then Scissors B times, Paper C times and Rock again D times produces the best possible answer for such a method.

Turns out such constants can get you an expected win rate of $$$28.13 \times E$$$ for $$$W = 0$$$, $$$28.71 \times E$$$ for $$$W = \frac{E}{10}$$$ and $$$31.51 \times E$$$ for $$$W = \frac{E}{2}$$$, so a total expected score of $$$500 \times \frac{28.13 + 28.71 + 31.51 + 40}{4}$$$ or $$$16000$$$.

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    The analysis is already published.

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I after many adhoc thoughts, wrote a dp and it came simple enough dp involving states n, number of rock, scissors and paper. I used double also in hope to manage precision . At last constructed the solution, using the character to be chosen for maximum.

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится -25 Проголосовать: не нравится

I did not find the round interesting also C was really weird. Managed to solve the first 2 and get a rank of 1400'ish. Here are the ideas,

A
B
Code - A
Code - B
  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

    B can also be solved by noticing the number of days cannot exceed $$$\sqrt{2 \times G}$$$ as then even starting from $$$1$$$, we get $$$\frac{n * (n + 1)}{2} \gt G$$$.

    Also notice that there is exactly 1 way to get a given score in a given number of days, as $$$sum_{i = j}^{i = j + k} {i}$$$ increases as $$$i$$$ increases. Since this property is monotonic, we can binary search on it, solving the problem in a total of $$$O(\sqrt{G} logG)$$$

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +18 Проголосовать: не нравится

Expected value of probability of asking a problem from "Probability Theory" in Google Kickstart or Codejam =1.

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can someone help me to provide a counter-case for A, please?

My Code for A: Smaller Strings
  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +9 Проголосовать: не нравится
    Check this testcase :
    

    1 12 9 edciahibffdh

    The output shud be 257993

    but you are getting 257994
    • »
      »
      »
      4 года назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Thanks a lot, buddy, just a tweak and it passed both tests. Thanks, again! Although, I wasted my 2 hours in searching for the mistake :'(

    • »
      »
      »
      4 года назад, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится -8 Проголосовать: не нравится

      I used a condition s[i]<s[n-i-1] till i=(n+1)/2 to check if the ans would be increased by one.Turns out I was wrong. I implemented it in another way and got AC but anyone can help me with 1st approach.

      My code:-
»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +11 Проголосовать: не нравится

Could somebody share how they came up with a good enough hash function for D? I came up with functions $$$(a \cdot RAND + b) \% mod1$$$ and $$$(a + RAND1) \cdot (b + RAND2) \% mod2$$$ pretty fast, but they didn't pass the second case and I was having trouble creating a better function.

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
    Rev. 3   Проголосовать: нравится +13 Проголосовать: не нравится

    $$$(70 * (a + 45) + 40 * (b + 9)) * (130 * (a + 23) + 90 * (b + 7))$$$

    Just some random sum and multiplication. it worked for me.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 года назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Thanks, indeed I tried (after contest) hash function $$$(a \cdot a \cdot RAND1 + b \cdot b \cdot RAND2 + a \cdot b \cdot RAND3 + RAND4) \% mod$$$ and it seems to work. I'm not sure why my functions were too weak though.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 года назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится +19 Проголосовать: не нравится

        First can be easily failed with addition and second with multiplication.

        For example, $$$(a\cdot RAND + b) \% mod1 + (c \cdot RAND + d) \% mod1 = (a\cdot RAND + d) \% mod1 + (c \cdot RAND + b) \% mod1$$$ (if b and d don't overflow $$$mod1$$$, but assume they are small enough)

        For second one similarly $$$f(a, b) \cdot f(c, d) = f(a, d) \cdot f(c, b)$$$

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 года назад, # ^ |
            Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

          Thanks for the explanation!

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 года назад, # ^ |
            Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

          Is Q4 meant to be solved using hash function ? I was thinking doing all non sense using bigint and all with max 200 digits

          Asking this because this is the first time I came across a real use of hasing in CP.I always felt hashing is luck dependent so why would anyone use it in a contest

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 года назад, # ^ |
            Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +9 Проголосовать: не нравится

            You can use a custom hash function for the # operations, but it needs to be strong enough (this solution is mentioned in the official editorial). About it being luck based: the probability of it actually failing is usually very low, and you can further decrease it by using a tuple of hashes instead of only one. And you don't need big int because you can just calculate everything modulo some prime.

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 3   Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

for problem B . After analysing on first 100 values of 'g' . I found out that answer is total number of odd unique factors of 'g' . And finding factors can be done in O(sqrt(N)) for given value of N. I need proof for this :).

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +41 Проголосовать: не нравится

Me after reading C:
"I will never play rock paper scissors ever again!"

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I can't understand what problem C meant they gave so confusing explanation too
If anyone has good explanation please link it here

I solved A subtask 1
B complete question
and D subtask 1 but I used randomisation and python large numbers

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +60 Проголосовать: не нравится

The transitions in the editorial for C are wrong.

Should be: \begin{split} v[r][p][s] & = & \max & (v[r — 1][p][s] + \frac{p}{n — 1} \times \mathbf{W} + \frac{s}{n — 1} \times \mathbf{E}, \ & & & v[r][p — 1][s] + \frac{s}{n — 1} \times \mathbf{W} + \frac{r}{n — 1} \times \mathbf{E}, \ & & & v[r][p][s — 1] + \frac{r}{n — 1} \times \mathbf{W} + \frac{p}{n — 1} \times \mathbf{E}) \ \end{split}

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +67 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I made the same mistake. It cost me 1 penalty, 30 minutes and 50 strands of hair

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +11 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Could you explain it?

    • »
      »
      »
      4 года назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +22 Проголосовать: не нравится

      If we choose rock, we win if the opponent chooses scissors and draw if they also choose rock. The probability of them choosing scissors is $$$p / (n - 1)$$$ and the probability of them choosing rock is $$$s / (n - 1)$$$ (according to the problem statement). The cases in which we choose paper or scissors can be handled similarly.

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Can precision loss be an issue? I did the same but it failed and I still don't know what's going wrong in my solution https://ideone.com/iedIGo

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Between oversleeping and some mix of panic/annoyance at the lagging judge, I ended up chipping away at smol solves and settling in on D which (EVENTUALLY) worked out... thought I was being smurt by putting in an intentional TLE (infinite loop) to diagnose an RE bug, but somehow managed to both fix the latter (break rather than keep trying to parse an input that got shortened) by adding something unnecessary (account for (0)->0) while also adding an actual infinite loop bug (attempting to get a unique randint from too narrow of a range)... tl;dr crappy rainboy impression was actually crappy...?

272nd is the best I've done in these sorts of things, not sure how to feel about it... maybe slightly relieved after failrun at codejam round 2...?

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Your performance is the perfect depiction I have seen of the constant reminder everyone gives but hard to follow of "reading all the problems". Good job lol

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 9   Проголосовать: нравится +28 Проголосовать: не нравится

Problem D is really easy to implement in Python. We don't even need to parse the expression manually, but rather we can let Python's built-in eval() take care of it.

The idea is to override the | operator (or any other unused operator) and then replace all existing occurrences of # with our overridden operator. The eval() function can then automatically parse and evaluate the resulting expression. We only need to provide the hash function.

Code
  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I didn't know the inbuilt implementation of eval I did something like this

    code
  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I upsolved it with a random oracle function

    @Infix
    @lru_cache(None)
    def op(x, y):
        return random.randint(0, 2**64-1)
    
»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -14 Проголосовать: не нравится

In the "Rock Paper Scissor" problem, for the DP transactions there is no proof provided that the optimal answer for a particular state is resolvable from one of the exact previous state. I don't see why that would be the case always.

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    If you have an optimal (highest-scoring) strategy, take any prefix, suppose it has r rocks, p, papers, and s scissors. Then that prefix is the highest scoring among all strategies with r rocks, p, papers, and s scissors, as otherwise, you could rearrange the prefix and get a strictly score overall.

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +18 Проголосовать: не нравится

The problems were quite good, but the system works worse and worse everyday. I faced numerous issues with loading problem statements just after beginning at Kick Start Round B and Code Jam Round 2. It took almost minute for me to load at least one problem statement. Today at Kick Start Round C I spent even more time trying to load problem statement. At some point a saw the "Something went wrong, please try again in 30 seconds" message. And I was not deceived, I had to wait for more than 30 seconds before the next attempt to load a problem statement. And yes, all these delays between submitting and displaying the queued attempt left me with tons of doubts:

  • Is the issue on my side?

  • How much time a have to wait before doing something?

  • Should I submit the solution again?

  • Should I refresh the page?

And so on... Please, consider updating the contest system. As of today, it is causing too much inconvenience to the participants.

»
4 года назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

What will be the rating of problems A, B,C, D in terms of CF question ratings

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится -18 Проголосовать: не нравится

    In my opinion, it should be like:

    Problem B — Div2 A — 1100 — Tags: Math

    Problem A — Div2 B — 1500 — Tags: Implementation

    Problem C — Div2 D — 2100 — Tags: DP, Games

    Problem D — Div2 E — 2300 — Tags: Hashing

    • »
      »
      »
      4 года назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +9 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Completely disagree. I think both problems A and B are close to Div2 C. Problems C and D are far from what you typically see at Codeforces contests. Problem C can be solved with DP-approach that is typical for Div2 E / Div1 C. Problem D is about implementation and picking up a proper hashing function. This problem is not suitable for use in Codeforces contests.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 года назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

        I thought D will be interesting and suitable in a Hackforces Educational Round.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 года назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится -8 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Problem D is about implementation and picking up a proper hashing function. This problem is not suitable for use in Codeforces contests.

        Hacking isn't an issue if your function is randomized by time, right?

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          4 года назад, # ^ |
            Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

          That wasn't about hacking to be honest. By Codeforces contests I rather meant contests with hidden verdict. It might be very unpleasant to got WA only because for $$$#$$$-operation you picked one of the few functions that fail system testing.

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            4 года назад, # ^ |
              Проголосовать: нравится +12 Проголосовать: не нравится

            Then I disagree. Choosing a proper hashing function is part of the solution. This could be used in a CF round and the main drawback is only that it's somewhat standard.

            (btw. getting WA on systests is always unpleasant)

»
4 года назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Google kickstart

Smaller Strings

Getting TLE for Test Case2

(Following official editorial's method)

`Can someone suggest any improvements please?``` ~~~~~ Your code here...

#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

int exp(int a,int b){
    int res=1;
    while(b){
        if(b&1)
            res=res*a;
        a=a*a;
        b>>=1;
    }
    return res;
}
int basek(string s,int k){
    int ans=0,n=s.length();
    for(int i=n-1;i>=0;i--){
        ans=ans+(s[i]-'a')*exp(k,n-i-1);
    }
    return ans;
}
string generate(string s,int l,int v,int k){
    while(v>0){
        s+='a'+(v%k);
        v=v/k;
    }
    while(s.length()<l){
        s+='a';
    }
    reverse(s.begin(),s.end());
    return s;
}
int main() {
	// your code goes here
	ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
	cin.tie(NULL);
	int t,l=1;
	cin>>t;
	while(t--){
		int n,k;
		cin>>n>>k;
		string s;
		cin>>s;
		int ans=0,h=ceil(n/2.0);
		string t="";
		
    for(int i=0;i<h;i++){
        t+=s[i];
    }


    int total=0;
    total=basek(t,k);
    for(int i=0;i<total;i++){
        string temp=generate("",h,i,k);
        if(temp<t){
            ans+=1;
        }
    }
        int nextSt=0;
       string r=t;
       reverse(r.begin(),r.end());
       if((n&1)){
           nextSt+=1;
       }
       for(int i=nextSt;i<r.length();i++){
           t+=r[i];
       }
       if(t<s){
           ans+=1;
       }   
    cout<<"Case #"<<l<<": "<<ans<<endl;
    l++;
}
return 0;

} ~~~~~

  • »
    »
    4 года назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    You need to compute the answer modulo $$$10^9+7$$$. It seems like you forgot about it.