I can't understand it. Only 6 people have passed it in the contest.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
I can't understand it. Only 6 people have passed it in the contest.
Name |
---|
Imagine tourist being unable to solve a 2100 problem...
Rating system gets a "WA on test case 1610" verdict
I think that if *2100 problems are in such difficulty like this, I will never become a master.
UPD : It was updated.
Maybe because there were blues among these 6 people...
But only 6 people have passed it in the contest
Maybe Mike just calculates average rating of these people
IMO it would be faulty logic -- if tourist makes an alt, and becomes the only one to solve the problem, that shouldn't make the problem get a 800 rating. Mike wouldn't have calculated it this way
That should be $$$\frac{3366+3315+2838+1772+1714+2236}{6}\approx 2540$$$. So the problem should at least get *2500.
Calculates average performance and not rating?
So calculating average rating is a type of wrong logic.
Even so, the rating I calculated(*2500) is higher than the actual rating(*2100).
I don't think so -- a newbie ACed 1610I and the problem got a normal 3300 rating
he_____hezhou may be hehezhou 's account.
likely, but then the system shouldn't be able to tell...
Also 1603F - October 18, 2017 is *2700 but only 3 people solved the problem officially
fun fact: djq_cpp said 1603F - October 18, 2017 is a classical and trivival problem.
I'm curious about the way to calculate the difficulty of problems... I don't think that it's reasonable.
It is now fixed. It is now 3100. Funny that the difference is a whole 1000 in rating.
MikeMirzayanov do you type the ratings in manually?