We invite you to participate in CodeChef’s July Cook-Off, this Sunday, 3rd July , Rated for All. Time: 8:00 PM — 10:30 PM IST
Joining me on the problem setting panel are:
Setters: Valerio TheScrasse Stancanelli, Soumyadeep soumyadeep_pal_21 Pal, Tejas tejas10p Pandey, Lavish lavish315 Gupta, Nandeesh nandyboy Gupta, Danish danishiitp_24, Aryan Aggu_01000101 Agarwala, Seemanta border Bhattacharjee, Danny dannyboy20031204 Boy, Yash DenOMINATOR Goyal, Cozma tibinyte2006 Tiberiu-Stefan, Anmol .-O_O-. Choudhary, Ashley errorgorn Khoo
Tester: Harris gamegame Leung
Statement Verifier: Kanhaiya notsoloud1 Mohan
Contest Admins: Radoslav radoslav11 Dimitrov
Head Admin: Alex Um_nik Danilyuk
Editorialist: Đặng Đoàn Kuroni Đức Trung
Also, if you have some original and engaging problem ideas, and you’re interested in them being used in CodeChef's contests, you can share them here. Hope to see you participating.
Good Luck!







solutions. So I just thought "Eh, I guess
solutions aren't supposed to pass". But today I actually realized that I'm not sure if my solution is actually
if we use persistent trees to keep the adjacency lists, but I find this to be a very ugly approach.
with the C++ pragma optimizations or with some greedy optimizations. My team also passed it like that.
or
depending how we implement our query. First we will have the standard DP:
. 
or something like that but I cannot prove it. So can someone either provide a counter sample or help me prove it. Thanks in advance!
or faster). 
