| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
|
0
Same question... |
|
0
Since it is a greedy approach, every one with the idea might implement the way I did, so the coincidence happens simply because we got to the same approach, not cheating. |
|
0
I think it is easy to come up with similar ideas as my solution and erwin2409's, and we came from different countries so there's no way for us to discuss / share codes with each other. |
|
0
Oh, I didn't see that, thanks for your clarification. |
|
0
In Problem B, why does running n*m where n >= 1e5 and m >= 1e5 doesn't get TLE? I was stuck because of this. |
| Name |
|---|


