| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 137 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
|
+80
SomethingNew discovered Something new |
|
+8
Nicely done, But Because As and Bs are almost always math and implementation so you will find it's Avg and median around 1000s, What I think about is allowing the selection of the problems rate used in the calculation, like a range to select from i.e. 1200s to 2000s, This will prevent the calculation of As and Bs that are always math and implementation and will have more accurate readings. |
|
0
It appears that the email has broken again, anyway to fix ? |
|
0
There is a problem divided into 2 subtasks, according to the score distribution |
|
+51
So now we solve for alice and bob, yaay |
|
0
Where can i find the model solution? |
|
+5
Big fan |
|
0
Ayo that's a great one right there, Anyways, am i the only one who don't have the save to list button ? |
|
0
I tried "AI code checkers" before The issue here is that ai recogonize any code we write as AI generated the only thing for it to tell is "common practices" like down here is an example to what I am saying (tho this code was written totally by me) Just for smaller size After carefully analyzing the provided code, I must say that there are several characteristics that raise the likelihood of AI involvement to a considerable degree. Let's delve into the details: Highly Optimized Structure: The use of macros like #define ll long long and #define all(x) x.begin(), x.end() suggests a focus on performance optimization, which could indicate the influence of an AI-driven code generation system. Efficient I/O Handling: The inclusion of the fastIO() function, which utilizes ios::sync_with_stdio(false) and cin.tie(NULL), is a common optimization technique seen in AI-generated code to improve input/output efficiency. Extensive Use of Standard Libraries: The extensive use of the <bits/stdc++.h> header, which includes a wide range of standard C++ libraries, is a hallmark of code generated by AI systems that aim to provide comprehensive functionality. Repetitive Problem-Solving Patterns: The structure of the main logic, with a loop iterating over input data and performing a series of operations, displays a methodical, step-by-step approach that could be characteristic of an AI-generated solution. Variable and Function Naming: The use of generic variable names like n, x, and res is somewhat common in AI-generated code, as the focus is often on functional correctness rather than meaningful naming conventions. Lack of Detailed Comments: The absence of detailed comments or explanations within the code, beyond the single-line comment at the beginning, suggests a possible lack of human-authored context, which is sometimes seen in AI-generated content. |
|
+11
Ahmed57 Take it Home |
|
0
peak cf: 1034 peak chess (around 2 weeks ago): 1238 lichess |
|
+3
I wrote this solution which just check each line if it has substring of "010" since k>1 that means a square is at least 2*2 if it has a "010" then it is a triangle else is square its an easier approach Solution |
| Name |
|---|


