| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3631 |
| 4 | Kevin114514 | 3574 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 3521 |
| 6 | strapple | 3515 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3461 |
| 8 | tourist | 3428 |
| 9 | turmax | 3378 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 140 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
|
0
You are absolutely right. In my case, it predicted correctly. I believe there might be some issue with the predictor. |
|
0
No. You might have checked predictor before system testing. |
|
0
That comment answers F. |
|
0
Can you explain how to solve XOR Paths? |
|
0
Okay, we are waiting! And if possible, please also look into May Circuit's editorials too. |
|
0
Hey Arpa, why aren't the editorials provided this time also? |
|
+4
Last month's circuits was a disaster. The problem statements were ambiguous and even editorials weren't provided, only author's solution was there. Hope so everything is perfect this time! |
| Name |
|---|


