| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
|
0
I didn't get why am I getting tle in D although it is O(n) time and space complexity https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1882/submission/228653180 |
|
+15
Same here, as I am commenting this. |
|
0
I didn't get why this blog has so much downvotes? |
|
0
My test cases are passing for 1753B - 27 - Factorial Divisibility https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1753/submission/177676671 but for 1 2 1000 It returns No instead of Yes. I applied inverse modulo arithmetic approach. EDIT: I checked the constraints a[i] < x because of which, after dividing the number, the quotient will not cross the primes, which above test case doesn't fulfils. |
|
0
Reply for:- Your solution 167259236 for the problem 1713C significantly coincides with solutions prabhavagrawal7/167259236, tanu24/167285258. Such a coincidence is a clear rules violation. Note that unintentional leakage is also a violation. For example, do not use ideone.com with the default settings (public access to your code). If you have conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition, write a comment to post about the round with all the details. More information can be found at http://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/8790. Such violation of the rules may be the reason for blocking your account or other penalties. In case of repeated violations, your account may be blocked. I have posted my boilerplate code here! and commit history is earlier than the contest itself. The main logic inside func() totally differs so please return the ratings to usual. |
|
0
As AI improves, it will achieve higher rating. More data -> More Efficient |
|
-38
What if we distribute processing power between computers based on blockchain kind of technology, with specific profiles for each kind of CPU it can work and we could track clock cycles instead of time used by a specific CPU. |
| Name |
|---|


