| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Weird checker on 100299K
Related: 100299K - Digraphs, 290508668
The first case in test 3 was (like the following one):
676
aa
ab
ac
...
And my output for the case was (ASCII 96):
`
That was an illegal character, yet the checker gave me an accepted???
It's been 10 (11?) years yet I'm the first one who discover this...
MikeMirzayanov fix this please...
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en10 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-09 07:57:05 | 8 | ||
| en9 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-09 07:56:32 | 21 | ||
| en8 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 16:42:43 | 2 | ||
| en7 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 16:40:21 | 41 | ||
| en6 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 16:39:19 | 55 | ||
| en5 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 14:28:09 | 8 | ||
| en4 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 13:21:10 | 8 | ||
| en3 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 11:58:00 | 360 | ||
| en2 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 11:52:11 | 415 | ||
| en1 |
|
035966_L3 | 2024-11-08 11:42:17 | 324 | Initial revision (published) |
