| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3985 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3814 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | Benq | 3529 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
| 8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 169 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 162 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | awoo | 154 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
| 10 | luogu_official | 151 |
Lower bound on empty set is TL!?
While solving Goodbye 2015, E i was getting TL on test 11. Now after the contest I decided to see what was the problem.
After some debugging I found that when you do lower bound on an empty set it gives TL:
http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/611/submission/15127498 — AC
http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/611/submission/15126396 — TL11
The only difference is ans if(s.size() == 0) break;
So I want to ask if there are similar issues with the std::set.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
radoslav11 | 2015-12-30 22:30:56 | 161 | ||
| en1 |
|
radoslav11 | 2015-12-30 22:00:35 | 511 | Initial revision (published) |
