| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3985 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3814 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | Benq | 3529 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
| 8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 169 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 162 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | awoo | 154 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
| 10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Problem in understanding Magic Formulas(424C)
Hi,
I just read the editorial of Magic Formulas. I couldn't understand a particular formula in editorial.
In editorial it is written that,
.
But in question, the formula is given as,
.
I am not able to understand how these formulas are equivalent. Please help me understanding what I am missing here.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
hrushikesht | 2017-05-29 10:27:15 | 9 | ||
| en1 |
|
hrushikesht | 2017-05-27 12:32:16 | 674 | Initial revision (published) |
