| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3803 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3707 |
| 3 | Benq | 3627 |
| 4 | ecnerwala | 3584 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
| 6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3542 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 167 |
| 2 | awoo | 163 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 152 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 5 | nor | 151 |
| 7 | atcoder_official | 147 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 146 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 143 |
Help for an <O(n), O(1)> solution for range minimum query
Currently, I am researching about range minimum query. I read the topcoder article. At the end of the article there is an <O(n), O(1)> solution for the restricted RMQ.
I didn't understand the article and I have googled it but what I have found was too complex for me. I am a newbie so I need some simple explanations or sources.
