I was wondering if there is a possible solution that uses a segment tree rather than a BBST (balanced binary search tree), as I find that segment trees are easier to implement.
Please help, and thanks in advance!
EDIT: Bump!
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
USACO Airplane Boarding Problem: Sol Using Segment Tree?
I was wondering if there is a possible solution that uses a segment tree rather than a BBST (balanced binary search tree), as I find that segment trees are easier to implement.
Please help, and thanks in advance!
EDIT: Bump!
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en5 |
|
vamaddur | 2017-09-12 08:13:15 | 8 | Tiny change: '\n\nEDIT: Double Bump!' -> '\n\nEDIT: Triple Bump!' | |
| en4 |
|
vamaddur | 2017-09-08 18:19:26 | 7 | Tiny change: '\n\nEDIT: Bump!' -> '\n\nEDIT: Double Bump!' | |
| en3 |
|
vamaddur | 2017-09-07 19:05:45 | 15 | Tiny change: 'n advance!' -> 'n advance!\n\nEDIT: Bump!' | |
| en2 |
|
vamaddur | 2017-09-05 15:30:51 | 30 | Tiny change: 'han a BBST, as I fin' -> 'han a BBST (balanced binary search tree), as I fin' | |
| en1 |
|
vamaddur | 2017-09-04 20:19:11 | 323 | Initial revision (published) |
| Name |
|---|


