I know the global rounds tend to have good problems, but other than those, which rounds tend to have higher quality problems? Sponsored rounds? rounds with tons of authors? Are there any specific authors who always have incredible rounds?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3741 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3489 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3483 |
8 | Kevin114514 | 3442 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
2 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | nor | 150 |
which old rounds are high quality?
I know the global rounds tend to have good problems, but other than those, which rounds tend to have higher quality problems? Sponsored rounds? rounds with tons of authors? Are there any specific authors who always have incredible rounds?
Rev. | Язык | Кто | Когда | Δ | Комментарий | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
en3 | AkshajK | 2019-08-10 00:27:03 | 14 | Tiny change: 'red rounds? rounds wi' -> 'red rounds (which ones)? rounds wi' | ||
en2 | AkshajK | 2019-08-10 00:15:48 | 44 | Tiny change: 'le rounds?' -> 'le rounds? anyone have specific round recommendations?' | ||
en1 | AkshajK | 2019-08-10 00:15:11 | 272 | Initial revision (published) |
Название |
---|