| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3985 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3814 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | Benq | 3529 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
| 8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 169 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 162 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | awoo | 154 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
| 10 | luogu_official | 150 |
[SUGGESTION] Failing sample test cases(>1) shouldn't be counted as wrong submission
In short: If a problem has 4 sample test cases, and code fails at test 4 then wrong submission is counted, but if it fails at test 1, this code is not counted as wrong submission.
We often over-read the sample output and submit the code, which costs us points. I suggest, if any of the sample test cases fail, wrong submission shouldn't be counted.
MikeMirzayanov, Please look into it.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en3 |
|
AnonySharma | 2020-07-01 20:14:11 | 59 | Tiny change: 'e counted.' -> 'e counted.\n\nPlease look into it. [user:MikeMirzayanov]' | |
| en2 |
|
AnonySharma | 2020-07-01 20:12:28 | 0 | (published) | |
| en1 |
|
AnonySharma | 2020-07-01 20:11:45 | 457 | Initial revision (saved to drafts) |
