Wrong positive case for plagiarism in Round 690(Div. 3)

Правка en1, от Prabhu_AGS, 2020-12-17 16:46:43

Attention! __ Your solution 101339246 for the problem 1462D significantly coincides with solutions liar_liar/101292392, Alan612/101305989, concoction/101323219, aditrip/101327012, shalinjain349/101329688, abd_U1/101339246. Such a coincidence is a clear rules violation. Note that unintentional leakage is also a violation. For example, do not use ideone.com with the default settings (public access to your code). If you have conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition, write a comment to post about the round with all the details. More information can be found at http://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/8790. Such violation of the rules may be the reason for blocking your account or other penalties. In case of repeated violations, your account may be blocked. __

Proof that coincidence in code(Problem D,round 693) occurred because of using public code from GeeksforGeeks before the start of the round.

Here is the link

This code was last updated on 9th May,2020

It's very clear that KpartitionsPossible function is similar in the following codes which was used from gfg including mine:

101339246(My submission) 101292392 101305989 101323219 101327012 101329688

I think this evidence is conclusive to prove that I am innocent. Even all the templates and main function is different in all codes.

Please give me the change in rating I deserve! :) Even though I can make up the rating loss in the upcoming contest, I don't want to be in the blacklist(warned) coders :(

Теги round 690, div.3

История

 
 
 
 
Правки
 
 
  Rev. Язык Кто Когда Δ Комментарий
en1 Английский Prabhu_AGS 2020-12-17 16:46:43 1816 Initial revision (published)