| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 166 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 163 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
Polygon API enhancement proposal
Hello, CodeForces!
Recently I was working on a Java library that implements interaction with Polygon API. It is very useful for some my tasks and it's cool that Polygon provides an API. But I discovered that is's kinda outdated. There are many new features in Polygon for which theres is no access through the API.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:52:53 | 1967 | (published) | |
| en1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:58 | 349 | Initial revision for English translation (saved to drafts) | |
| ru1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:40 | 349 | Первая редакция (сохранено в черновиках) |
