| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3985 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3814 |
| 3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 4 | Benq | 3529 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
| 6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
| 8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 169 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 162 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | djm03178 | 158 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | awoo | 154 |
| 8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
| 10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Polygon API enhancement proposal
Hello, CodeForces!
Recently I was working on a Java library that implements interaction with Polygon API. It is very useful for some my tasks and it's cool that Polygon provides an API. But I discovered that is's kinda outdated. There are many new features in Polygon for which theres is no access through the API.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:52:53 | 1967 | (published) | |
| en1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:58 | 349 | Initial revision for English translation (saved to drafts) | |
| ru1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:40 | 349 | Первая редакция (сохранено в черновиках) |
