More formally, in the problem it is necessary to find all natural numbers $$$n = 2 \times k^2 + 1$$$, where $$$k$$$ is a natural number, and $$$n$$$ is a palindrome. We can assume that there are not very many such numbers, and try to run a search for such numbers.
Iterating over the number $$$n$$$ will take too long, since $$$n$$$ can reach $$$10^{18}$$$. We need to come up with a better way. Note that since $$$n \le 10^{18}$$$, then $$$k \le \sqrt{\cfrac{10^{18} - 1}{2}}$$$, that is, $$$k$$$ does not exceed $$$10^9$$$. So, you can iterate over the number $$$k$$$ instead of $$$n$$$, calculate $$$n$$$ and check whether it is a palindrome.
Search asymptotics: $$$\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{N} \log{N})$$$, where $$$N$$$ is the maximum possible $$$n$$$, in our case $$$N = 10^{18}$$$. (We assume that checking whether a number is a palindrome is performed for its length, that is, for $$$\mathcal{O}(\log{N})$$$)
It may seem that this iteration will take quite a long time, but in practice it takes from 40 seconds to 15 minutes, depending on the programming language and the implementation of the algorithm.
As a result of the search, it can be understood that there are only numbers suitable for the condition of the problem 21: $$$3$$$, $$$9$$$, $$$33$$$, $$$99$$$, $$$393$$$, $$$969$$$, $$$38211283$$$, $$$91044019$$$, $$$95855859$$$, $$$357727753$$$, $$$10284648201$$$, $$$91637373619$$$, $$$93323232339$$$, $$$100083380001$$$, $$$3119172719113$$$, $$$100540454045001$$$, $$$302791646197203$$$, $$$982885848588289$$$, $$$9188622002268819$$$, $$$150434127721434051$$$, $$$355553961169355553$$$.
Now we know all the suitable numbers and that there are not so many of them. This means that we can write all these numbers as an array in the program code and then work with them without trying to count them every time we run.
There are different ways to respond to requests. You can search using bin search for the index of the minimum number that is not less than $$$l$$$ and the index of the minimum number that is greater than $$$r$$$. And then the answer is the difference of these indices. Then the asymptotics of the solution will be $$$\mathcal{O}(t \log{B})$$$, where $$$B$$$ is the number of suitable numbers, $$$B = 21$$$.
But you can do it easier, since we have only 21 numbers, for each request you can iterate over each number and check whether it lies in the required range. Then the asymptotics of the solution will be $$$\mathcal{O}(tB)$$$, where $$$B$$$ is the number of suitable numbers, $$$B = 21$$$.
There should probably be ways to optimize the iteration of numbers so that you can iterate over them right in the solution, before answering queries, or even find them all without iterating, but the task involves solving in the described way.