Blog entries - Codeforces

#	User	Rating
1	tourist	3993
2	jiangly	3743
3	orzdevinwang	3707
4	Radewoosh	3627
5	jqdai0815	3620
6	Benq	3564
7	Kevin114514	3443
8	ksun48	3434
9	Rewinding	3397
10	Um_nik	3396

#	User	Contrib.
1	cry	167
2	Um_nik	163
3	maomao90	162
3	atcoder_official	162
5	adamant	159
6	-is-this-fft-	158
7	awoo	157
8	TheScrasse	154
9	Dominater069	153
9	nor	153

Think you can solve it :)? We all know it is expected that contradictory comparison functions may cause Runtime Error when used by the sort method. For instance, one could try sorting an array using a function that only returns True!

However, when seemingly equivalent procedures start giving different results, curiosity strikes!
Take this example:

struct number{
    int z;
    const bool operator< (const number &that) const{
        return z <= that.z;
    }
}numbers[10000];

int main (){
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        numbers[i].z = 2;
    }
    sort(numbers, numbers+10000);
    return 0;
}

Note the operator< returns <=. In some cases this would cause a Runtime Error, such as if you replaced the
"numbers[i].z = 2;" line with something like "numbers[i].z = i%10;". But we will focus on this case, on which it does not result in error.

By now you must've noticed this struct basically simulates the sorting of an integer array, except for the <= comparison. So, one would expect an int array to behave similarly, when using a similar comparison function! Yet...

int array[10000];
const bool myfunc (int a, int b){
    return a <= b;
}

int main (){
    for(int i = 0; i < 10000; i++){
        array[i] = 2;
    }
    sort(array, array+10000, myfunc);
    return 0;
}

If you try to execute this piece of code, although it inherently seems to be doing exactly the same as the one above, a Runtime Error will occur this time. Can you guess why? :)

Full text and comments »

Oi.'s blog