now we have the exact formula to climb "top"

I feel like people are being needlessly brutal here.

oh no !!!1 ! 1! ! ! I lost

but rhobdoks won fairly

sir please support rhobdoks

yousr sicnreyle, Sparky_Master_WCH1226

Someone already suggested to don't show negative ratings behind some value (but still show it's behind it). There are a lot of strange people out there who want to be on the bottom and I'm afraid of how far they are willing to go to achieve something like that. I guess in this case Mike could just erase the guy who leaked the problem, so he wouldn't be seen on the standings, but there are a lot of problems with that and you can't do it automatically (Rhodoks isn't even at fault). Plus, "Botswana" guys are arguably not offensive enough to be banned, but are very annoying and maybe would be less annoying if they couldn't have been compared to other annoying people

the big problem the both of them are red coders

Actually it's unfair to him. I am the tester of round 810, and Rhodoks is very nice and took our suggestions very seriously. He asked me to test this round because he wanted to make his contest more friendly to python users, so he doesn't mean to make this contest bad.

Most importantly, he is not the writer of div1E. It's zxyoi who just copy-paste a problem as div1E and none of us have discovered it, including him (because it's too difficult for all of testers to solve the last problem of div1, we are only master or candidate master levels). I try to clarify this in the announcement post but also get heavily downvoted because of the anger of participants.

Now his post have more than 3000 downvotes, I only hope everyone not to downvote his solution post of 810 to make things worse.

My contribution have just become to -1. Really so sad!!! Please help me increase it to 0

Now Sparky_Master_WCH1226 is back to "top" again.

I really think Rhodoks is being mistakenly blamed too much.

UPD: Now zxyoi has a lower contribution that Rhodoks