| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Name |
|---|



I think so but it is an old problem so maybe bad test cases?
I tried it on my local machine with this testcase:
"a"*100000 + "bc"*50000
it passed in 200ms :)
This solution uses ovidiush11's trick. String erase is apparently O(0). I hope he can explain with more details because I am not good enough for this obscure idea yet.
Marinush
what is O(0)
Takes exactly 0 time, else it can't be bounded above by a multiple of 0
Well, technically every code is $$$\Omega (0)$$$ ;)
Hi, your comment is not funny nor helpful. Next time, please refrain from writing such comments.
Please, live a life.
Sure thing, you too :)
Hi, your comment is not funny nor helpful. Next time, please refrain from writing such comments.
Please, live a life.
Hi, your comment is not funny nor helpful. Next time, please refrain from writing such comments.
Please, live a life.
It is $$$O(n^2)$$$, but all your operations are basically
memcpy, so the constant factor is really small.I see...
thanks for the answer
order is n^2 but Coefficient is small