| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 156 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 10 | nor | 152 |
I was solving problem Buying gifts. I am getting wrong answer if I use ordered_multiset(pbds) submission link. If I use std::multiset instead of ordered_multiset than solution gets accepted submission link. Can somebody explain why and what am I doing wrong???
Note : Sorry for my bad English.
ordered set with less_equals doesnt work well, it's not meant to be used like this. If you want it to act like a multiset with the special order functions, then use it with pair<int,int> where the first value is the number and the second is a unique index, and then a normal less<> comparator will work well
means is this any internal problem of pbds? can you provide any link of documentation or tutorial or more deep understanding.
I am still confused why this happens ??
https://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/88193 Partially answered here. The thing is that it uses a general template for a balanced tree so using less_eqial messes up the ordering