Given a string Str, rearrange Str such that the resultant string T maximizes min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))).
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Given a string Str, rearrange Str such that the resultant string T maximizes min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))).
Name |
---|
looks like min (LCS(Str, T) and LCS(Str, reverse(T))) cannot exceed longest palindromic subsequence of Str, hence T=Str should work, i may be wrong tho
Actually it can exceed that.
Let $$$str = \text{aabb}$$$, $$$T = \text{abba}$$$. Now, $$$\min(\mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{abba}), \mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{abba})) = \min(3, 3) = 3$$$.
If you choose $$$T = str$$$, you get $$$\min(\mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{aabb}), \mathrm{LCS}(\text{aabb}, \text{bbaa})) = \min(4, 2) = 2$$$.
yeah, i knew most probably my claim must be wrong
anyways, please tell how to solve the above problem