| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | Kevin114514 | 3678 |
| 3 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3582 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3473 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3418 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | turmax | 3345 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
| Name |
|---|



Sum can be 1e14 which would lead to overflow you can set a upperlimit of 1e9
The maximum value that a long long variable can have is $$$2^{63} - 1$$$. In your code
sumcan be equal to $$$2 \cdot 10^{14}$$$ in some test cases and thusmid * midmay get bigger than the long long limit.In worst case, the sum can be 2*10^14 then the mid will be 10^14. mid * mid will be 10^28. long long can hold at most 10^18.
instead of binary search,why arent you using sqrt its much simpler code