This was my submission 256491105. Can somebody explain to me why this solution gives TLE?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | maroonrk | 153 |
5 | atcoder_official | 148 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
5 | SecondThread | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | nor | 144 |
10 | TheScrasse | 142 |
This was my submission 256491105. Can somebody explain to me why this solution gives TLE?
Название |
---|
You’re making an array of size $$$2e5+1$$$ for every test case and there are like $$$10^4$$$ tests. Instead you should’ve made the array of size $$$n+1$$$, and then proceeded with whatever you’re doing (this will get rid of the TLE)
Thank you!
But if i send it in C++20 it works 256544470
Do you know what could be the difference?
That is really strange. I don’t know why this happens; I’d expect it to TLE as well
the problem could be solved easily by counting number of cards having 2 ouccrences to get max score optimally . and your tle problem is solved by the guy before me
because u use (2e5+1) * (10^4) and this it too large, u can use map<int, int> instead