Блог пользователя tofael1104

Автор tofael1104, 6 месяцев назад, По-английски

I was actualy in read only mode, which is why I am unable to reporting about this.

bl

But I want to thank bajelega for writing about this.

It's totally unfair for cause of BAN just because reporting cheating. In fact I have also witnessed the abnormal downvotes of his positive comments including his blogs as well.

Also some people actually think I am Heap_OverFlow alts just because supporting him.

Please UN BAN him MikeMirzayanov.

Respected $$$Admins/Moderators$$$, please meddle.

Thanks!

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • -43
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
6 месяцев назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +46 Проголосовать: не нравится

It's clear as day that he was banned for contribution farming. Sadly, reporting cheaters wasn't his only blogs/comments activity.

  • »
    »
    6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Wait, what do you mean by "contribution farming"? As far as I can see, most of the blogs and comments are aimed to get some sort of positive reaction from the public.

    • »
      »
      »
      6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится -13 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Is helping someone with an issue in VS code IDE considered contribution farming? That is a reply on a comment he helped by that Hawkwatch_19. That comment was unexplainably downvoted as well as the OP thankings, though his advice worked.

      or smth like this

      Refer to this comment

      If it's a system automated action, due to number of readonly, then reportings by cheaters played a role, and thus it is somehow unfair action.

    • »
      »
      »
      6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +35 Проголосовать: не нравится

      In short, you can't see the activities which were aimed at farm that I meant, but I started to notice them before he delete it.

      (For more obvious evidence, you can compare his activity it to much more upvoted activity of Dominater069 and see an unexpected difference in contribution.)

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
        Rev. 4   Проголосовать: нравится -40 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Seems fair, yes I know he sometimes trolled by posts like this and then deleted. It is wrong ok, but a warning could have sufficed?

        But isn't a ban for that a little excessive? And leaving actual cheaters that caused him readonly modes and content removal as my previous comment in reply to 34z.

        He still helped some people as evident for example in this and above that he reported some serious cheaters and even cases not detected by the plag system that helped in someway the platform plag check I guess.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится +19 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Can you please explain sir, Why he banned again..? Heap made a new account couple of hours ago and reply your this comment...which seems quite positive to me and indeed got upvoted to +29 even!

        So why his comment removed and banned again..?

        https://i.imgur.com/1lbKhSA.jpeg

        Thanks!

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
          Rev. 5   Проголосовать: нравится +5 Проголосовать: не нравится

          Indeed! Heap__OverFlow.'s comment in reply to mod Vlad, was removed and banned despite it was at +31. Something very fishy looks to be happening even 34z12000's comment in reply to mod Vladosiya was removed too but without a readonly mode.

»
6 месяцев назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +25 Проголосовать: не нравится

Completely deserved ,My request to Mikey to never un-ban him

  • »
    »
    6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится -36 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Completely deserved, never un-ban

    Are you a friend of the biggest cheater in india or what? :D Don't you think he deserves a ban too ?

    according to this comment, the 1_2_3_4_5_9 TG group has about 5k members.

    After reporting such a cheater by him, all his comments got downvoted, even something like this helping solve an issue for the OP, even the OP thanking comment was downvoted lol

    • »
      »
      »
      6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится -10 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Lol i wouldn't be the least surprised if heap , you, the one who posted this blog and Hawkwatch_19 turn out to be the same person

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
        Rev. 3   Проголосовать: нравится +7 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Lol, non-sense. so ask a doubt for VS code on MAC via Hawkwatch, and solve it through heap ? Then I (bajelega) re state what was in heap comment so people can benefit (after comment removed probably due to read only mode) ?

        Please, attend the logic class.

        Why completely NEGLECT the acts of the biggest cheater in india with 5K Telegram group tho and haven't said a word about ?

»
6 месяцев назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +36 Проголосовать: не нравится

Good job by Mike and Co. Clearly he was farming contribution with cringe blogposts and comments.

»
6 месяцев назад, # |
Rev. 4   Проголосовать: нравится +16 Проголосовать: не нравится

Reporting is a feature only for 1900+ users, so it's highly unlikely that he was banned by the cheaters he keeps harping on about, as they are mostly about the same people and greens/grays. Most likely his constant posting just annoyed enough high rated people over a while as his posts just fill up Recent actions and push down more deserving content. People's patience is a limited resource, so the ban is probably deserved and he should take this as a lesson.

  • »
    »
    6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
    Rev. 8   Проголосовать: нравится -18 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Check the 2nd half of this or that comment (was taken out of one of his removed due to read only blogs) which is in the same blog here. so no he actually reported different people and different ranks already :)

    including high rated, master and Candidate cheaters :)

    Is 1_2_3_4_5_9 / El-Ged_Sevawy a specialist ? xD 14_15_16 which is owned by same as 1~9 is now specialist ok, but you can see it is also reported and had a peak of Candidate master, having similar code reported with another CM cheater

    • »
      »
      »
      6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Even if they all reported him, that is not enough to get him banned, otherwise a lot of other people would have been already chatbanned. I think a lot more people must have reported him, and those high rated cheaters didn't make up the difference.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

        Even if they all reported him

        Really ? In the screenshot above, 3 mentioned were capable of reporting :) peaked at Candidate at least.

        What about the fact that one of them runs a 5K member TG group ? so you think all these reports won't suffice to trick the system into fake read only mode and content removal ?

        It seems there is also other reason for banning, some spammy posts as per Vladosiya, but I honestly feel it is somehow an exaggerated move to ban cuz of this ?

»
6 месяцев назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Does anyone know when/how people get flat-out banned? Does it happen after a certain number of 48-hour read-only modes or do you get the 48-hour read-only modes indefinitely?

  • »
    »
    6 месяцев назад, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +4 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I think it is related to the number of read-only modes, and that's why I say it was unfair to ban him! because there had been fake read-only modes caused by high rated cheaters, he reported (master and cand).

    the reason said by vlad, is

    It's clear as day that he was banned for contribution farming.

»
6 месяцев назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится -19 Проголосовать: не нравится

Finally?