Experienced_Reversal's blog

Feature Request : TestCase Answer highlighting
By Experienced_Reversal, history, 6 months ago, In English

When i hover over the input it highlights the block and shows its testcase number.

Can the same feature please be implemented for the output. Like, when we hover a specific output it highlights the testcase block and also shows the testcase it belongs to.

UPD: Guyz its a sincere request if u think its a good feature, please upvote so that CF staff considers it. Please consider this feature MikeMirzayanov. Thanks.

  • Vote: I like it
  • +160
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

Totally agree, it will be an useful feature to have.

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

Would love to have this feature. I hate when i have to count lines to know which testcase the output belongs to. Please add this Feature.

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

I think it's not hard to implement

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I agree, this way in long output problems there will be no need to add an empty line between test cases which causes confusion for new people.

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Support

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

I agree.

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Support

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +33 Vote: I do not like it

Of course, it would be cool to have similar highlighting in example outputs as well. And even, say, synchronously highlight an input-output test case pair when hovering over. Unfortunately, standard checkers are often used, in which information about test cases is lost.

https://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/105779

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I agree

→ Reply
»
6 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I agree

→ Reply