Negationist's blog

By Negationist, history, 3 months ago, In English

In the speedbreaker question, why do we need to do: c++ mn[i]=min(mn[i],mn[i-1]),mx[i]=max(mx[i],mx[i-1]);

I (mostly) get everything besides that. Thanks in advance!

Full submission by Zqr123456 on Div 2 contest:

Also, I get why the first condition is necessary for there to be a solutions and I get why the second part of the code finds that good interval, but I'm having a little trouble piecing together the sufficiency of the two to guarantee the right answer. Perhaps this is also why I font understand why you have to do the operations on the mins and maxes too.

#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
int T,n,a[200005],mn[200005],mx[200005],l,r;
void solve(){
	cin>>n;
	for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)mn[i]=n+1,mx[i]=0;
	for(int i=1;i<=n;i++)cin>>a[i],mn[a[i]]=min(mn[a[i]],i),mx[a[i]]=max(mx[a[i]],i);
	for(int i=1;i<=n;i++){
		mn[i]=min(mn[i],mn[i-1]),mx[i]=max(mx[i],mx[i-1]);
		if(mx[i]-mn[i]>=i){cout<<"0\n";return;}
	}
	l=1,r=n;
	for(int i=1;i<=n;i++)l=max(l,i-a[i]+1),r=min(r,i+a[i]-1);
	cout<<r-l+1<<'\n';
}
signed main(){
	ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
	cin.tie(0),cout.tie(0);
	cin>>T;
	while(T--)solve();
	return 0;
}
  • Vote: I like it
  • +17
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Negationist (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 months ago, # |
Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +21 Vote: I do not like it

First of all, learn how to write a blog properly. Click

What is this absolute mess of a code that you just posted. No indentations or newlines. Writing the code in the way same as other part of the text. Also no pop-down menu to where code is written. A stupidly big bold header as if it was the main heading/point of the blog. Code readability $$$-\infty.$$$

Suggestion:

Instead of writing the code like this, Write it as:

Code
»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Negationist (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Negationist (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Negationist (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
3 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Negationist (previous revision, new revision, compare).