why does a 1500 rated question from div1 + div2 feels way harder than a 1500 rated question from div2?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3885 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3580 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3506 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3505 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3457 |
9 | Kevin114514 | 3377 |
10 | gamegame | 3374 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 170 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 161 |
4 | maomao90 | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | Dominater069 | 155 |
8 | adamant | 154 |
9 | luogu_official | 153 |
10 | awoo | 152 |
why does a 1500 rated question from div1 + div2 feels way harder than a 1500 rated question from div2?
Name |
---|
It's not like human can set same level of difficulty problems in every contest. You found some 1500 rated problem from div1 + div2 feels harder then a 1500 rated question from div2. I also found vice verse.
In my experience, the length of the contest affects the calibration of the problem rating (at least in terms of implementation difficulty). I think it's because in a longer contest more people will have time to solve it so the user rating of the average solver will be lower
i think the rating of a problem is somehow related to the number of people who solve that problem in the contest.
I believe that a rating of x on a problem means that half of the people around that rating will be able to solve that problem. Since Div 1 + Div 2 usually have higher rated participants in general, a 1500 rated problem might be harder in general than a Div 2 1500 rated problem.
This would make sense if Div1 + Div2 had higher rated participants around 1500 rating, but why would that be the case?
True. And it's much harder to get the same performance at Div.1 than at Div.2.