| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
The answer is yes: Droping_points. I believe it is broken for div 2 and div 4 the same way too.
MikeMirzayanov we need to fix this ASAP. There are 2 ways to do it, let's vote:
Change the notice from "rating should be between 0 and x" to "rating should be <= x".
Do not change the notice and forever prohibit users with negative rating from rated participation.
I think we should go further and ban negative-rated users from all avenues of participation in civil society.
I think we should just keep the rating on unsigned integer
LOL I support this.
unsigned integer with wrap-around >>>
So when people go below zero, they will get a rating of 4294967295. (unsigned integer overflow)