№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3741 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3489 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3483 |
8 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 158 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 156 |
8 | djm03178 | 155 |
9 | TheScrasse | 154 |
10 | Dominater069 | 153 |
Название |
---|
Let Level(X) will be index of vertice X in some topologically sorted vector of vertices. DP(x1, x2, x3) — maximum possible length of 3-path (x1, x2, x3) -> (t1, t2, t3). to calculate DP(x1, x2, x3) you shuld try to move from some of three vertices (x1, x2, x3) with minimum Level.
UPD: vertices are already topologically sorted, Level(x) == x.
It's O(N^4). Maybe there is better solution.
thank you very much
but is what is wrong with my solution ?!
It's wrong. Even bfs is not a BFS.
is that because it can be longest 3-crtical path that the 3 paths are not the longest for each path ??
I did't get your question but I think answer is "Yes".
your bfs does'nt finds longest path.
that's what i meant... thank you again :-)