Блог пользователя Monish2000

Автор Monish2000, история, 5 недель назад, По-английски

Hello OtterZ and Codeforces Team.

I want to clarify that my submission 367670051 for Codeforces Round 1087 (Div. 2), Problem D — Ghostfires (2209D), was written independently by me. I did not communicate with any participant, and I did not copy code from any user.

The warning mentions a similarity with submission 367635666. I want to state clearly that I did not exchange code with that user or with anyone else.

During the contest, the only external tool I used was OnlineGDB to run and test my code. I did not click the Share button, I did not generate a public link, and I did not intentionally publish my code anywhere. Nor used any code sharing platforms to use others code as my own.

I also noticed that my submissions were marked as skipped while submission 367635666 was not. I understand that public verdict patterns do not necessarily reveal the internal reasoning of the plagiarism review, so I am not drawing conclusions from that alone. I am only requesting that my case be reviewed based on the facts of how I worked during the contest.

I also want to add that reaching my current level on Codeforces took me real time and effort across many contests. My progress matters a lot to me, which is exactly why I would not risk it by copying or sharing code.

I am posting this only to state the facts of how I worked during the contest. If needed, I can provide more details about my workflow.

P.S: I hope this is the correct place to post this clarification, since the warning message did not specify an exact location.

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • -16
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
5 недель назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Monish2000 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
5 недель назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Monish2000 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
5 недель назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by Monish2000 (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
5 недель назад, скрыть # |
Rev. 4  
Проголосовать: нравится +4 Проголосовать: не нравится

There is no way you both came up with two codes that close.

anyway, does someone seriously use OnlineGDB for competing on codeforces?

I also want to add that reaching my current level on Codeforces took me real time and effort across many contests. My progress matters a lot to me, which is exactly why I would not risk it by copying or sharing code.

YOU LITERALLY ONLY SOLVED 27 PROBLEMS

Being a cheater is something, but getting caught with such an obvious proof and still denying it is a Patrick level stupidity

Also why is not https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/2209/submission/367635666 skipped as well?

  • »
    »
    5 недель назад, скрыть # ^ |
    Rev. 3  
    Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I use a 2017 Macbook Air, which I have messed it up a lot of times, currently into ML theory and analysis my work I do not want to install another compiler as well.

    And it's not just onlinegdb, if that's down I will use any online compiler do that I don't have to install any new packages, there are times I tested my code on kaggle.

    I am not new to programming, I have over 200(medium and hard) problems solved in leetcode (like I started around 2021) till date. I understand you saying that I am a cheater, but I didn't do it. I came to this platform to test my own skills, it's not like I will reach legendary rating and all, because I know my limit is around 1600 or 1800 at max if I practice more.

    I know how similar that looks, I wish codeforces recorded my screen activity to show that I didn't. But it doesn't. And not to be patrick, I don't even know the other user you have mentioned. My rating now is around 1100, saying that I violated the rules. Just saying my side of story

    Thank you.

»
5 недель назад, скрыть # |
 
Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I know you are right , this contest is marred with false plags.

  • »
    »
    5 недель назад, скрыть # ^ |
     
    Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    you didn't even attend this contest...

    • »
      »
      »
      5 недель назад, скрыть # ^ |
       
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Hello ! You are right that I didn’t participate in this contest . I know someone who did . His contest was skipped . I have concrete proof that he did not cheat and false plag happens , it’s almost impossible to avoid false plags however robust the system is . What better can be done is - 1. Improve the validation process , have the identity verified.

      1. Have proctored contests , for those who want to be rated .
      1. There should be a fair review mechanism , the only way right now for someone to be heard is to write a blog , get bullied by vigilantes and see your dignity be tarnished by fellow participants.

      the ladder board has lost its meaning .

      Read earlier blogs , you will see predominantly they were about knowledge sharing or playful banters . Now it’s all about low rated vigilante — bullying , commenting on cheaters and cheating .