Rating changes for last rounds are temporarily rolled back. They will be returned soon. ×

RodionGork's blog

By RodionGork, history, 9 years ago, translation, In English

I'm so pleased — I have first great cheater at my site CodeAbbey. Well... damn! This fellow was not lazy — he copied and slightly refactored about 125 solutions (I believe, shared by his colleague) — and then asked for certificate. Why he want it — no idea! It is not certificate by Oracle or Microsoft. Anyway he spent about 3 weeks and see how it looks like:

original source

source pretending to look different

(And probably it is only my imagination — their similarity?)

Well, jokes aside — I have a trouble — this time it was easy enough to find cheating since there are not too many users — and only few dozens top-users. But if such cases will repeat when there are more people... I may want some automated comparison of sources.

Current idea — I can calculate certain metrics / hashes over the solution and save them along with it. They can be, well, amounts of puncuation symbols, operator symbols etc. And when I need to check the user — we would find few with the closest set of metrics. Something like Locality-Sensitive Hashing. But I before trying to experiment with this blindly I decided to ask clever community — perhaps some people already have worked with similar tasks and could hint on some good ideas to look at / learn from?

I believe, for example, that CF administration have their own tools — but as one wise colleague suggested, they probably are not going to share their know-how to avoid sharing secrets with cheaters at the end... :o

  • Vote: I like it
  • +14
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
9 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been translated by RodionGork(original revision, translated revision, compare)

Wow — autocomment is a cool feature but seems I could not remove it now...

»
9 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it
  • »
    »
    9 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

    Thank you! Great hint! I suspected that some people already worked on similar problem — and here it is — and interesting article by the way... :)

»
9 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it