Hello, can anybody give me hints for this problem? I think heavy light decomposition could handle the type-1 query, but how about the type-2 query?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 151 |
Name |
---|
My (author's) solution uses the fact that there are not many nodes having many children and nodes with not so many children are easy to handle.
Of course, as an author I don't want to reveal the full solution but I think this hint is enough for you to get it. I am happy to see many different approaches that didn't occur to me, including a good portion of HLD solutions.
Thanks for your hint. I'll try it again.
I solved this using this technique e.e in $$$O(n \log^2 n)$$$, I can optimize it to $$$O(n \log n)$$$ using this blog.