| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Hi Codeforces,
In problem "Kefa and Dishes" (580D div 2), statements said that: "It is guaranteed that there are no such pairs of indexes i and j (1 ≤ i < j ≤ k), that xi = xj and yi = yj."
But in the 5th test case:
7 4 3 2 6 13 5 7 1 9 6 1 15 2 5 3 6 4 8
It's easy to see that x1 = x3. Was this test case invalid?
I think it's not a contradiction. Although it is x1 = x3, it doesn't mean "xi = xj and yi = yj" if y1 is not equal to y3. It means it should be (xi, yi) ≠ (xj, yj). It's just a coincidence but in yesterday's ACM-ICPC style contest I did exactly this type of misreading and I got 8 Wrong Answers.