How can I calculate this with efficiency without using HLD or Link Cut Trees? I tried doing it with Binary Lifting but I am not able to do it correctly. Please guide me. Thanks.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
How can I calculate this with efficiency without using HLD or Link Cut Trees? I tried doing it with Binary Lifting but I am not able to do it correctly. Please guide me. Thanks.
Название |
---|
You are in the right path if you tried doing it using binary lifting. Have you managed to succeed in doing a regular binary lifting (just to find the LCA of 2 vertices)? If not I recommend you reading this blog
Now, if you understand how to find LCA of 2 vertices, you do almost the same thing you did for calculating the parenting array but instead you do it for the length of edges
// g is the adjacency list
// w is the "adjacency list" of weights
void DFS(int node, int cost, int par = -1) {
}
For a query it is again very similar to finding the LCA of 2 vertices.