How internally upper_bound for sorted vector(in ascending order) works in c++. Let say 'A' is a sorted vector.Then how upper_bound(A.begin(),A.end(),x) will directly give iterator to first element greater than x. Thanks in advance.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 166 |
2 | maomao90 | 163 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | nor | 153 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
How internally upper_bound for sorted vector(in ascending order) works in c++. Let say 'A' is a sorted vector.Then how upper_bound(A.begin(),A.end(),x) will directly give iterator to first element greater than x. Thanks in advance.
Название |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by hellomoto (previous revision, new revision, compare).
The functional behavior of the
std::upper_bound()
template is described in www.cplusplus.com.It is basically based on binary search. Therefore, its time-complexity should be , provided that random-access of any item is done in constant-time that is independent of problem size which is the count of items between the first and the last item.
thanks.
With pleasure.