Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
→ Обратите внимание
→ Трансляции
→ Лидеры (рейтинг)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3803 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3707 |
| 3 | Benq | 3627 |
| 4 | ecnerwala | 3584 |
| 5 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
| 6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3542 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
→ Лидеры (вклад)
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 164 |
| 2 | awoo | 163 |
| 3 | adamant | 162 |
| 4 | maroonrk | 152 |
| 5 | -is-this-fft- | 151 |
| 6 | nor | 150 |
| 7 | atcoder_official | 147 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 146 |
| 9 | Petr | 145 |
| 10 | SecondThread | 142 |
→ Найти пользователя
→ Прямой эфир
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2024 Михаил Мирзаянов
Соревнования по программированию 2.0
Время на сервере: 03.07.2024 10:35:28 (h1).
Десктопная версия, переключиться на мобильную.
При поддержке
Не, ну это бан
k
Why do you post this?
Codeforces are bad. You can cheat freely in it.
Your English are bad :(
*your english is bad :(
codeforces have s at the end so it should go with are :))
Edit : clearly my comment was not to provide true statement
Now I know that my english is very bad :(
If I'm not mistaken, we're allowed to used macros but not to obfuscate the code.
The first solution should be removed.
Sure, it is a cheating. I'll handle it.
Hey, didn't you notice the user above you?
Original solution: 77 ms
After obfuscation: 31 ms
So he did not try to cheat, he tried to make it faster.
Also the fun part is that he forgot to remove the first line with the original author's name.
C++11 takes less time than c++17
Hi Sir Is there proof for this? I am curious.
https://www.quora.com/Is-C-becoming-faster-or-slower-as-new-revisions-come-out-C-11-C-14-C-17-etc