Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
| Name |
|---|



k
Why do you post this?
Codeforces are bad. You can cheat freely in it.
Your English are bad :(
*your english is bad :(
codeforces have s at the end so it should go with are :))
Edit : clearly my comment was not to provide true statement
Now I know that my english is very bad :(
If I'm not mistaken, we're allowed to used macros but not to obfuscate the code.
The first solution should be removed.
Sure, it is a cheating. I'll handle it.
Hey, didn't you notice the user above you?
Original solution: 77 ms
After obfuscation: 31 ms
So he did not try to cheat, he tried to make it faster.
Also the fun part is that he forgot to remove the first line with the original author's name.
C++11 takes less time than c++17
Hi Sir Is there proof for this? I am curious.
https://www.quora.com/Is-C-becoming-faster-or-slower-as-new-revisions-come-out-C-11-C-14-C-17-etc