# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | nor | 150 |
Name |
---|
it also give same wrong answer for C++11
your 'tot' operation look unbehaviour
it should be
X[tot + 1] = X[tot] + 1, tot++;
You mean that the operation
++tot
doesn't same in C++17 and C++14 ? sorry for my poor English.He means "undefined behavior". It's a kind of coding error and you shouldn't do that.
it also got accepted with C++ 11 ,here:61043518
I could not find any operation for this behaviour.
Since it failed on 2nd test case so you can put debug statement with condition (n==5) so it won't fail on 1 case and you can know where it start changing behaviour.
If you find the mistake please update in post as well, i would like to know where it fail
See This answer in stack-overflow. In your submission
X[++tot] = X[tot-1] + 1
; is undefined behavior for c++ versions less than c++17: The left hand side of the = operator can be executed before or after the right hand side. In c++17, it's guaranteed that the right side will be executed before the left side. I think you assumed that in X[tot-1] tot's value was increased by 1 because of X[++tot], but actually tot is increasing later.Thanks again ShafinKhadem !
See This answer in stack-overflow. In your submission
X[++tot] = X[tot-1] + 1;
is undefined behavior for c++ versions less than c++17: The left hand side of the = operator can be executed before or after the right hand side. In c++17, it's guaranteed that the right side will be executed before the left side. I think you assumed that in X[tot-1] tot's value was increased by 1 because of X[++tot], but actually tot is increasing later.Thank you very much.
That's not only the execution order is undefined. The entire expression is undefined. Anything can happen.
See http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/readings/undef.950321.html .
thank you very much,Chinese friend