vovuh's blog

By vovuh, history, 5 years ago, translation, In English

<almost-copy-pasted-part>

Hello! Codeforces Round 617 (Div. 3) will start at Feb/04/2020 17:35 (Moscow time). You will be offered 6 or 7 problems (or 8) with expected difficulties to compose an interesting competition for participants with ratings up to 1600. However, all of you who wish to take part and have rating 1600 or higher, can register for the round unofficially.

The round will be hosted by rules of educational rounds (extended ACM-ICPC). Thus, during the round, solutions will be judged on preliminary tests, and after the round it will be a 12-hour phase of open hacks. I tried to make strong tests — just like you will be upset if many solutions fail after the contest is over.

You will be given 6 or 7 (or 8) problems and 2 hours to solve them.

Note that the penalty for the wrong submission in this round (and the following Div. 3 rounds) is 10 minutes.

Remember that only the trusted participants of the third division will be included in the official standings table. As it is written by link, this is a compulsory measure for combating unsporting behavior. To qualify as a trusted participants of the third division, you must:

  • take part in at least two rated rounds (and solve at least one problem in each of them),
  • do not have a point of 1900 or higher in the rating.

Regardless of whether you are a trusted participant of the third division or not, if your rating is less than 1600, then the round will be rated for you.

Thanks to MikeMirzayanov for the platform, help with ideas for problems and for coordination of my work. Thanks to my good friends Daria nooinenoojno Stepanova, Mikhail awoo Piklyaev, Maksim Neon Mescheryakov and Ivan BledDest Androsov for help in round preparation and testing the round.

Good luck!

</almost-copy-pasted-part>

UPD: Editorial is published!

  • Vote: I like it
  • +183
  • Vote: I do not like it

| Write comment?
»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

Good Luck to all participants!

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I know there is a Points Penalty of 50 points but what is the Time Penalty all about?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Educational CF Round and Div.3 Round have no points penalty. Instead, they have time penalty, which depends on the time when a participant submitted correct submission and the number of wrong submission. In detail, if you solved problem k minutes after the start of the competition, your solved problem number increases by 1, and your penalty increases by 10×(the number of wrong submission on that problem)+k.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +18 Vote: I do not like it

Looks great! Maybe this is the round when I finally become rated. ;O

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +29 Vote: I do not like it

    Why are you so eager to become green?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it -18 Vote: I do not like it

    you can't because this contest is only rated for trusted participants. And the criteria being trusted is

    1. take part in at least two rated rounds (and solve at least one problem in each of them)
    2. do not have a point of 1900 or higher in the rating.

    and you didn't participate any contest till now.

    • »
      »
      »
      5 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +30 Vote: I do not like it

      Regardless of whether you are a trusted participant of the third division or not, if your rating is less than 1600, then the round will be rated for you.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +21 Vote: I do not like it

I registered when I was cyan (during previous Div.2 contest) and now my Handle in registrants list doesn't have a star(*) next to it . Is it gonna be rated for me and people like me or not ? If yes I hope you fix it cause I don't think it's gonna be fair this way.

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

    you can deregister yourself by going to the registants page and click the red x button :D

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -11 Vote: I do not like it

Come on!!!

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can my rating increase or decrease if I am an unofficial participant and I take part in this Div3 ?

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -7 Vote: I do not like it

Vovuh and Codeforces div3 rounds.

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +54 Vote: I do not like it

Screenshot-from-2020-02-04-16-03-55)

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -6 Vote: I do not like it

what about the score distribution?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

    Div 3 and Educational Rounds don't have score distribution.

    They have penalties on time

    • »
      »
      »
      5 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it -9 Vote: I do not like it

      What is score distribution?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +13 Vote: I do not like it

        All problems score is same. which is

        A-B-C-D-E-F-G

        1-1-1-1-1-1-1

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I am late some minutes. Is it not possible to register after contest has started?

I am not able to submit :/

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can we hack any solution in this contest ? When does it start ?

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve E?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

    Solution for $$$E2$$$:

    Firstly observe that the question asks to use minimum number of colors such that subsequence formed by each color is sorted.

    Consider the longest decreasing subsequence (LDS) of the given array. Observe that no two elements of this sequence can be given the same color, hence number of colors must be greater than or equal to the length of the LDS.

    Now, to find a coloring with number of colors equal to length of LDS, let $$$lds(i)$$$ denote the length of longest decreasing subsequence which ends at $$$i$$$ and includes the $$$i$$$th element. Observe that if $$$a_i > a_j$$$ with $$$i < j$$$, then $$$lds(j) > lds(i)$$$. Importantly, $$$lds(j) \neq lds(i)$$$. Thus, you can just assign the $$$i$$$th element the color $$$lds(i)$$$.

    • »
      »
      »
      5 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

      But LDS will take n^2 time right?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

        No. You can find LDS in $$$O(n \log{k})$$$ where $$$k$$$ is the size of the alphabet using binary search/fenwick tree/segment tree. Even a simple $$$O(nk)$$$ algorithm will work for this problem. Search online for LIS solutions.

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Nice construction. Thanks!

      By the way, how did you come up with this LDS construction. It seems so..... exotic. It's really very nice.

      Had you encountered a similar problem before, or did you come up with the solution from scratch?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    You can also just check that a letter can't be assigned to the same color of any letter that has greater value and appears before (it is an inversion). I assigned bitmasks to every letter and every mask will have a bit of the corresponding color active if there is a letter that was already assigned to that color.

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

What's the reason 70267449 'Compilation Error' in C++17 but the same 70270849 worked on C++14 ?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    Name collision with data function, which was added in c++17

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    There's a template function in c++17 names "std::data", which makes your data variable ambiguous

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

I signed up for this div3 before the score reached 1600.Can anybody tell me that Will I be rated in this situation?Thanks~(I didnt find the star '*' beside my name during the competition)

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it -16 Vote: I do not like it

STLforces :)

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 4   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone explain to me how does the Test Case #1 for question-d is correct?

TC:
6 2 3 3
7 10 50 12 1 8
Answer: 5

I keep finding 6.

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    You need 2 tricks for 10 and 50 (10-2-3-2-(?)-2-(?)-2), same mechanism for 50. So you can't have 50 and 10 simultaneously

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    first , fourth and fifth monster can be killed without secret technique . Last monster can be killed by using technique once and rest of the monsters can be only killed using technique twice .

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +18 Vote: I do not like it

GreedyForces

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

My rating is less than 1600 now, but why I'm not in the official standings of the contest?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    May be you have not registered for the contest...

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Maybe you have not registered for the contest... Sorry commented again

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    You were expert, the time you registered for the contest. So you are out of competiton.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

hello I'm new to CF great problems! I like E2 and F very much

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 5   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

Fun fact: if you change statement of E2 so that you have to color all occurences of a fixed letter the same color and let alphabet size vary, you get an NP-complete problem by reducing to graph coloring.

UPD: no, that's actually wrong. Reduction I was thinking about was associating every vertex a single letter and then finding some permutation such that the graph is what you want. But that is wrong: there are $$$ n! \sim \sqrt{2 \pi n} \left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n $$$ permutations but $$$ 2^{C_n^2} $$$ graphs and there is no way to have a surjection.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

What is wrong with thislink for problem A(div3).

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

my solution to C

can anyone tell why this fails on test case 6? I transformed the string into integer array and used greedy approach to find the smallest sub array with 0 sum.

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Using +2 for "UP" and +1 for "RIGHT" means that your program thinks "ULL" is a net-zero sequence of moves. You could do some approach like this, if you did +N for "UP" and +1 for "RIGHT", then there would be no ambiguity because it would be impossible for enough L's to cancel out a U. Or you could just keep track of the sum into two parts, a netVertical and netHorizontal.

    • »
      »
      »
      5 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      but i am never considering odd sized subarrays, I am only checking for even sized subarray starting with 2, hence, I will never check for ULL.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 years ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        See nathan_drake 's example, even if it is even, you can still fall into that situation

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    1 6 UULLLL

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 4   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    just replace 2 with 10^6 but your code will still be tle, try hashmap, changed solution of yours it passes test case 6 my solution with hashmap with linear time complexity

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

I didn't solved a single problem, I feel so dumb right now...

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +12 Vote: I do not like it

    everyone didn't solved a single problem at the first time... cheer up man practice hard and get ready for the next contest.

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    @Ernis In the Codeforces Educational Round #81, I am also not able to solve a single problem. But in this contest, I performed decently. So just compete and don't give up.

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    Try to upsolve problems after contest has over ..its better for U

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Are there some extra spaces in Test case 6 of problem C? Using s.length() in C++ was giving runtime error while replacing it with n gave wrong answer.RE WA

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    may be the run time error because s.length type is unsigned integer so when the length is 0

    1 — length equal to unsigned integer max not -1

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    Print s.length()-3 and check the value then your questiom will be "how it passed 1st 5 cases?"

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

can we solve E1 by using bubble sort to generate a graph where there is an edge between two letters if we have to swap them, then check if this generated graph is a bipartite graph ?

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve F?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

    Sort the query asked by passenger in increasing order of minimum distance in path.

    now let for query(a,b,g) if i already assigned all edges with cost less g and assign all edge in path from a to b with g(if any edge is already assigned with less cost then reassign it with g) then minimum cost for a path can't be less than g. Since i am assigning the cost in increasing order then it might be the case that minimum cost in path from a to b can be greater than g(let after reassigning all edge with cost>g). So assign cost to all edges that come in path for every query in increasing order of cost and after processing all query check the minimum cost for every path in query if it doesn't match then there is no valid answer. if every query matches then we have the answer.

    here is my submission

    I solved it in O(n^2) but i am curious to know any soln with less complexity.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

please give idea to solve C & D

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 11   Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

    For C

    Store the current location while iterating you can begin at (0, 0) increase the values accordingly for L, U, R and D

    Store the last seen locations in a map or set and when you reach a point you've seen before check if the distance between the current index and index of where you last met the point is minimum and save it as your result.

    For D

    Calculate the number of tricks (the secret technique) you will need to gain points from each monster ignore if 0 (add 1 point to the result since you already earned it) sort the other trick values and pick from the minimum while k is sufficient

    You will need a trick if h mod (a + b) = 0, you need exactly ceil(b / a) tricks for that

    Or if h mod (a + b) > a let's call the remainder rem you need exactly ceil(rem — a / a) tricks for that.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Round has ended recently and now I'm really can't explain why my E2 solution works

Interesting experience :D

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

70254356 Why doesn't this solution end up in TLE? If we consider the number of operations it should be slow. I tried the same solution in GNU C++ 17 in custom invocation and this solution ends up in TLE but in MS C++ 17 it passes easily. Is there some kind of optimization in MS Visual C++? What am I missing here?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Interesting, if someone could throw a light it'd be great.

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

So someone replaced D with C .

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve E using graphs ??

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I feel that C was comparatively difficult than D.

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

What is the hack case is F? pajenegod

UPD : It TLEed

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
    Rev. 4   Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

    I was doing TLE hacks. In the end I was able to hack more than $$$100$$$ submissions with the same hack. My test was just to construct a tree in the form of a line, then do queries from one end to the other with weight $$$10^6$$$. To make the queries a bit heavier I made all the labels random and never asked the same query twice.

    One fun thing to note was that my test case hacked the checker for the problem.

    I've seen my hack take $$$46$$$ ms submissions to $$$1.3$$$ s, so my test was far heavier than the original test cases. Honestly the reason why my hack was so effective was because the original $$$267$$$ test cases were really sub-par. Not only did they not test the obvious max case, there were also obvious patterns in the data. For example if you made node $$$1$$$ be the root, then parent[i] < i in every single one of the original $$$267$$$ test cases. dorijanlendvaj noticed this pattern after I showed him a $$$46$$$ ms submission that I had made TLE. He figured out that the code got stuck in an infinite loop if parent[i] > i, which never happened in the original test cases.

    • »
      »
      »
      5 years ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

      Honestly, I did not expect such weak pretests.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Don't know about you guys...For me this is the best contest ever...

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why are some experts getting rated ?

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

My submission was TLE on System test. https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1296/submission/70275201

I submitted same code and got AC. https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1296/submission/70355834

Does this happen often?

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    It happens often if your solution runs closer to the TL. Runtimes can vary quite a lot (maybe up to 200 ms), but usually 30-60 ms.

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    Just so you know, you could have just done c[x,y] instead of c[str(x) + "," + str(y)]

»
5 years ago, # |
Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

in question C for 3rd division cant we use prefix-sums and check for sum of 'L' & 'R' for size 2 and sum of 'L'+'R'+'U'+'D' in the string and print the index where we get it.... what is wrong in this approach!!! on which edge case it might be wrong!! please help

  • »
    »
    5 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    The cycles can be not only of length 2 and 4.

    1
    8
    LLUURRDD
    

    Correct answer is 1 8.

»
5 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Hello, could someone help me check my submission for problem F? It got time limit exceeded on test 271. I already check it in my computer with a line graph, and it is slow (took around 7 seconds). I have no clue why it happened. Submission link: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1296/submission/71952020. Thank you!