Anons_SPYDER's blog

.
By Anons_SPYDER, history, 4 years ago, In English

.

  • Vote: I like it
  • -31
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

This is definitely not a good idea for some constructive problems, where knowing the jury answer could allow participants to reverse-engineer the solution from the outputs. This is a bit less of an issue for problems with fixed answers, but something like that can still happen to a lesser degree.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
    ← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Ari It can be taken care of , if we enable this checking only a limited number of times per each question, for example a maximum of 4 checks per question , I guess this clears it .

    → Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

You can easily know you've misunderstood the problem when you receive WA verdict.

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    4 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Yeah but in contests won't it be a -50 after passing pretest-1 only to fail in the next one

    → Reply
»
4 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Don't turn Codeforces into HackerEarth.

→ Reply