| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Name |
|---|



A little more than an hour remaining till registration closure
Will you provide screencast as for previous SRM's?
Why do you need a screencast? Is it help you to solve problems?
In screencast you could see how ideas are growing, you could see places, where solver made a mistake and where write something just in seconds. You could understand why solver choose this way of solving. Also you could understand why was chosen special idioms/classes/collections of concrete programming language.
Everybody could write an analysis after solving a problem. Great screencast is much rare thing.
Yeah, this is exactly why watching Egor's screencasts is a pleasure
probably put a minus those who watched a screen cast, but does not know about the possibility of rewinding and viewing on the speed of 2x-16x.
Ideas grow in your head or on a paper, you see nothing but coding warching a screencast.
Spending an hour and twenty minutes practicing is much more better idea.
I say what I know, not what I assume. I watched a few screen-casts and I think is useful to do this several times a year. Why not?
No, I would write from 2 monitor setup this time