question suggest some approach and reason behind it
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 163 |
| 2 | adamant | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| Name |
|---|



Prove that it is always optimal to swap any element into its final position.
Think of the array as a permutation, and consider cycles in the permutation. Define $$$f(A)$$$ as the sum of one minus the size of each cycle, where fixed points (elements in their final positions) are not counted. The $$$f$$$ value of a sorted array is $$$0$$$. Prove that any swap decreases $$$f$$$ by at most $$$1$$$, and there's always an operation that decreases $$$f$$$ by $$$1$$$.
How can you use knowledge of graph theory to easily determine how many swaps it takes to sort each group of elements?
Stop posting blogs for questions which're already google-able