Knowing the fact that 1D Fenwick Trees can be built in linear time, I am assuming that the 2D version can be built in quadratic time. I didn't manage to find anything about this. Can you help me with some links/ideas?
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | maomao90 | 163 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | nor | 153 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
Knowing the fact that 1D Fenwick Trees can be built in linear time, I am assuming that the 2D version can be built in quadratic time. I didn't manage to find anything about this. Can you help me with some links/ideas?
Название |
---|
For every updation in linear Fenwick tree we require O(log N ) time complexity.It takes Nlog(N) for linear or 1-D. sebi420p How can we built in just O(N) .
Actually, we can build a bit in O(n). Every index in a bit indicates the sum of the range [i — lowbit(i), i]. So, if you build a prefix sum array beforehand, you can use it to build the bit in O(n).
You can check this link
Thanks, that's a better way to build a bit.
Thank you!
Why is he downvoted, it's a good question.
I was wondering that too..
okwedook Thank you.